|
Euthanasia of Wild Horses and Burros for Reasons related to Health,
Handling, and Acts of Mercy:
This
policy identifies requirements for euthanasia of wild horses and
burros for reasons related to health, handling and acts of mercy.
Policy/Action: Final decisions regarding euthanasia of a wild horse
or burro rest solely with the authorized officer (43 CFR 4730). It
is understood that there will be cases
where this decision must be made in the field and cannot always be
anticipated. Appropriate wild horse and burro
personnel at facilities and in the field should be delegated
as the authorized officer regarding euthanasia of wild horses and
burros. Euthanasia will be carried out following the procedures
described in the 4730 Manual. The death record should specify that
euthanasia was performed and the reason that it was performed in the
appropriate Wild Horse and Burro
automated data system. These systems are the Wild Horse and Burro
Information System (WHBIS) or the Wild Horse and Burro Program
System (WHBPS). A Bureau of Land Management (BLM) authorized officer
will euthanize or authorize the euthanasia of a wild horse or burro
when any of the following conditions exist: (1) Displays a hopeless
prognosis for life; (2) Is affected by a chronic or incurable
disease, injury, lameness or
serious physical defect (includes severe tooth loss or wear, club
foot, and other severe acquired or congenital abnormalities); (3)
Would require continuous treatment for the relief of pain and
suffering in a domestic setting; (4) Is incapable of maintaining a
Henneke body condition score (see
Attachment 1) greater than or equal to 3, in its present
environment; (5) Has an acute or chronic illness, injury, physical
condition or lameness that would not allow the animal to live and
interact with other horses, keep up with its peers or maintain an
acceptable quality of life constantly or for the foreseeable future;
(6) Where a State or Federal animal health official orders the
humane destruction of the animal(s) as a disease control measure;
(7) Exhibits dangerous characteristics beyond those inherently
associated with the wild characteristics of wild horses and burros.
When euthanasia will be performed and how decisions will be made and
recorded in a variety of circumstances is described below.
Euthanasia in field situations (includes on-the-range and during
gathers): (A) If an animal is affected by a condition as described
in 1-7 above that causes acute pain or suffering and immediate
euthanasia would be an act of mercy, the authorized officer must
promptly euthanize the animal. (B) The authorized officer will
report actions taken during gather operations in the comment section
of the daily gather report (Attachment (2). Documentation will
include a brief description of the animal’s condition and reference
the applicable criteria (including 1-7 above or other provisions of
this policy). The authorized officer will release or euthanize wild
horses and burros that will not tolerate the handling stress
associated with transportation, adoption preparation or holding.
However, the authorized officer should, as an act of mercy,
euthanize, not release, any animal which exhibits significant tooth
loss or wear to the extent their quality of life would suffer. (C)
If euthanasia is performed during routine monitoring, the Field
Manager will be notified of the incident as soon as practical after
returning from the field. Euthanasia at short-term holding
facilities: Ideally, no horse or burro would arrive at preparation
or other facilities with conditions that
require euthanasia. However, problems can develop during or be
exacerbated by handling, transportation or captivity. In these
situations the authority for euthanasia will be applied as follows:
(A) If an animal is affected by a
condition as described in 1-7 above that causes acute pain or
suffering and immediate euthanasia would be an act of mercy, the
authorized officer must promptly euthanize the animal. (B) If an
animal is affected by a condition as described in 1-7 above, but is
not in acute pain, the authorized officer has the authority to
euthanize the animal, but should first consult a veterinarian. As an
example, if the animal has a physical defect or deformity that would
adversely impact its quality of life if it were placed in the
adoption program or on long-term holding, but acute suffering is not
apparent, a veterinarian should be consulted prior to euthanasia.
(C) If the authorized officer concludes, after consulting with a
veterinarian, that a wild horse or burro in a short-term holding
facility cannot tolerate the stress of transportation, adoption
preparation, or long-term holding then the animal should be
euthanized. Euthanasia at long-term holding facilities: This section
sets euthanasia policy for the BLM at long-term holding (LTH)
facilities including those that may be added in the future. The BLM
Wild Horse and Burro (WH&B) Specialist responsible for oversight of
the LTH facility (the Project Inspector) and the LTH contractor will
evaluate all horses and their body condition throughout the year.
During the year if any animal is affected by any of the conditions
listed in 1-7 above, the contractor or other person authorized by
the Project Inspector must euthanize that animal. Once a year a
formal body condition evaluation as well as a formal count of all
horses at long-term holding facilities will be conducted. The action
plan for the formal evaluation is as follows: 1. All animals will be
inspected by field observation to
evaluate body condition and identify animals that may need to be
euthanized to prevent a slow death due to deterioration of
condition. This evaluation will be based on the
Henneke body condition scoring system. The evaluation team
will consist of a BLM WH&B Specialist and a veterinarian acceptable
to BLM. The evaluations should be conducted in the fall (September
through November) to identify horses with body condition scores of 3
or less.
2. Animals with a body condition score less than 3 will be
euthanized in the field soon after the evaluation by the authorized
officer or a designated representative such as the contractor.
Horses with a score of 3 will remain in the field and will be
re-evaluated by the contractor and the Project Inspector for that
contract in 60 days to see if their condition is improving, staying
the same or declining. Those that are declining in condition will be
euthanized as soon as possible after the second evaluation. 3.
Euthanasia will be carried out with a firearm by the authorized
officer or a designated representative. Field euthanasia does not
require that the animals are gathered which would result in
increased stress and could cause injury to the horse being
euthanized or other horses on the facility. 4. Documentation for
each animal euthanized will include sex, color, and freeze/hip brand
(if readable). Copies of all documentation will be given to the
contractor and retained by the BLM. 5. Arrangements for carcass
disposal for euthanized animals will be in accordance with
applicable state and county regulations. Euthanasia of Unusually
Dangerous Animals: Unusually aggressive wild horses or burros can
pose an unacceptable risk of injury when maintained in enclosed
spaces where some level of handling is required. When a horse or
burro is unusually dangerous, it is reasonable to conclude that an
average adopter could not humanely care for the animal as required
by the regulations (e.g., provide proper transportation, feeding,
medical care, and handling 43 CFR 4750.1). The BLM cannot solve the
problem by removing unusually dangerous animals from the adoption
system and placing them in a LTH facility because this resolution
also poses significant risk of injury, both to animals in transport,
and to BLM
personnel
and LTH operators. When deciding to euthanize an animal because it
is unusually dangerous, the authorized officer, in consultation with
a veterinarian, extension agent, humane official, or other
individual acceptable to the authorized officer, must determine that
the animal poses a significant and unusual danger to people or other
animals beyond that normally associated with wild horses and burros.
The authorized officer must document the aspects of the animal’s
behavior that make it unusually dangerous. Euthanasia of a Large
Number of Animals for Reasons Related to Health, Handling and Acts
of Mercy When the need for euthanasia of an unusually large number
of animals is anticipated, the likely
course of action should be identified and outlined in advance
whenever possible. When field monitoring and pre-gather planning
identify an increased likelihood that animals may need to be
euthanized during a gather, this should be addressed in the gather
plan. In an on-the-range or facility situation where a gather is not
involved, advanced
planning
should also be done whenever possible. Arrangements should be made
for a USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) or
other veterinarian to visit the site and
consult with the authorized officer on the euthanasia decisions.
This consultation should be based on an examination of the animals
by the veterinarian. It should include a detailed, written
evaluation of the conditions, circumstances or history of the
situation and the number of animals involved. Where appropriate,
this information should be specific for each animal affected. During
this planning stage, it is critical that the Authorized Officer
include the State Office WH&B Program Lead; appropriate State
Office, District Office, and Field Office Managers; the WH&B
National Program Office (NPO); and any contractors that may be
involved. A euthanasia plan of action will include practical
considerations including: (1) who will destroy the affected animals,
(2) what method of euthanasia will be used, and (3) how carcasses
will be disposed of. A communications plan for internal and external
contacts (including early alerts to State, National Program and
Washington Offices) should be developed in advance or concurrently
while addressing the situation at hand. The communications plan
should address the need for the action, as well as the appropriate
messages to the public and the media. This will include why animals
are being euthanized and how the action is consistent with BLM’s
responsibilities and policy. Timeframe: This policy is effective
upon issuance. Budget Impact: Implementation of these actions would
not result in additional expenditures over present policies.
Manual/Handbook Sections Affected: No manual or handbook sections
are affected. Background: The authority for euthanasia of wild
horses or burros is provided by the Wild Free-Roaming Horses and
Burros Act of 1971, Section3(b)(2)(A) 43 CFR4730.l and BLM Manual
4730, Destruction of Wild Horses and Burros and Disposal of their
Remains. Decisions to euthanize require that BLM evaluate individual
horses or burros affected by injury, physical defect, chronic or
incurable disease, severe tooth loss, poor condition or old age. BLM
should consider the animal’s ability to survive the stress of
removal and/or its probability of surviving on the range if released
or transported to a BLM facility, adoption or long-term holding.
Humane, long-term care of these animals
requires
periodic evaluation of their condition to provide for their
well-being. These evaluations will, at times, result in decisions
that will require euthanasia. Coordination: This document was
coordinated with the Wild Horse and Burro Specialists in each
affected state and the National Program Office.
Contact: Questions regarding this memorandum should be directed to
Lili Thomas, Wild Horse and Burro
Specialist, Wild Horse and Burro National Program Office, at (775)
861-6457.
|